Ag Reporting
2020-21 agricultural use summary
For 2020-21, A, B and C grades were awarded to all catchments for agricultural use of water.
For stock water, Comet, Upper Dawson, Lower Dawson and Nogoa received A grades., Connors, Theresa, Mackenzie and Upper Isaac received B grades. and Callide, Lower Isaac and Fitzroy received C grades.
For crop water, Comet, Lower Isaac, Theresa, Mackenzie, Upper Dawson, Lower Dawson and Nogoa received A grades., Connors and Upper Isaac received B grades. and Callide and Fitzroy received C grades.
Overview
Suitability for Cropping
Summary of water quality results from creeks, rivers or on-stream storages compared to water quality thresholds for particular crops.
Catchment | Grade |
---|---|
Callide | ![]() |
Comet | ![]() |
Connors | ![]() |
Lower Isaac | ![]() |
Fitzroy | ![]() |
Theresa | ![]() |
Mackenzie | ![]() |
Upper Dawson | ![]() |
Lower Dawson | ![]() |
Nogoa | ![]() |
Upper Isaac | ![]() |

Exceedances
Aluminium
Callide:
Site #2702 Site #1714Connors:
Site #2016 Site #2477 Site #9203Fitzroy:
Site #9980Theresa:
Site #9693 Site #9695 Site #2026 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9987 Site #9702 Site #2798 Site #63 Site #64 Site #2446 Site #9194 Site #9706Lower Dawson:
Site #9117Upper Isaac:
Site #9799 Site #9697 Site #9803 Site #9802 Site #86 Site #87 Site #88 Site #89 Site #93 Site #94 Site #95 Site #96 Site #137 Site #140 Site #142 Site #2514 Site #9083 Site #9829 Site #9974 Site #9994 Site #9975 Site #9997 Site #9931Implications
Cobalt
Callide:
Site #2702 Site #1714Connors:
Site #2016 Site #9203Lower Dawson:
Site #9115 Site #9977 Site #9976 Site #9117Upper Isaac:
Site #9391Implications
Iron
Callide:
Site #2702 Site #2699 Site #1714Connors:
Site #9210 Site #9484 Site #2016 Site #2477 Site #9203Lower Isaac:
Site #2576Fitzroy:
Site #9980Theresa:
Site #9693 Site #9695 Site #9928 Site #2026 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9987 Site #9709 Site #9305 Site #9707 Site #9702 Site #2798 Site #9979 Site #9704 Site #2598 Site #9442 Site #48 Site #63 Site #64 Site #2446 Site #9194 Site #9706 Site #9439Lower Dawson:
Site #9120 Site #9116 Site #9117 Site #9106Upper Isaac:
Site #9981 Site #9984 Site #9729 Site #9983 Site #9799 Site #9697 Site #9803 Site #2513 Site #2765 Site #2782 Site #9802 Site #83 Site #86 Site #87 Site #88 Site #89 Site #90 Site #93 Site #94 Site #95 Site #96 Site #114 Site #115 Site #119 Site #137 Site #139 Site #140 Site #141 Site #142 Site #2514 Site #2438 Site #9083 Site #9982 Site #9974 Site #9363 Site #9994 Site #9975 Site #9391 Site #9997 Site #9931Implications
Electrical Conductivity
Cotton on Clay
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #2442 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9988 Site #2446 Site #9990Lower Dawson:
Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9109 Site #9108Upper Isaac:
Site #9729Implications
Lucerne on Loam
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #2442 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9988 Site #2446 Site #9990Lower Dawson:
Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9109 Site #9108Upper Isaac:
Site #9729Implications
Citrus on Sand
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9988 Site #2446 Site #9990Lower Dawson:
Site #9115 Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9109 Site #9108Upper Isaac:
Site #9729Implications
Peanuts on Sand
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #2442 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9988 Site #2446 Site #9990Lower Dawson:
Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9109 Site #9108Upper Isaac:
Site #9729Implications
Chloride
Citrus
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1569 Site #1647 Site #1714Fitzroy:
Site #1690Theresa:
Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9707 Site #1760 Site #2446 Site #9439Upper Isaac:
Site #9574 Site #9802Lucerne
Callide:
Site #1569Theresa:
Site #2442 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #1760 Site #2446Upper Isaac:
Site #9574 Site #9802Implications
Manganese
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Lower Dawson:
Site #9117Upper Isaac:
Site #9814 Site #9829Implications
Sodium
Cotton
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Theresa:
Site #9125Mackenzie:
Site #9988 Site #9989 Site #9990Lower Dawson:
Site #9115 Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9977 Site #9109 Site #9108Upper Isaac:
Site #9381 Site #9574Lucerne
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9988 Site #2459 Site #9989 Site #9990 Site #9194Lower Dawson:
Site #9115 Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9977 Site #9109 Site #9108Upper Isaac:
Site #9381 Site #9574 Site #9802Citrus
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1569 Site #1647 Site #1714Fitzroy:
Site #1690Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9707 Site #9988 Site #1760 Site #2446 Site #2459 Site #9989 Site #9990 Site #9194 Site #9439Lower Dawson:
Site #9115 Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9977 Site #9106 Site #9109 Site #9108 Site #9112Upper Isaac:
Site #9381 Site #9574 Site #2782 Site #9802 Site #9975Implications
Copper
Fluoride
Zinc
Cadmium
Molybdenum
Mackenzie:
Site #9990Lower Dawson:
Site #9977 Site #9117Upper Isaac:
Site #9381 Site #9829Implications
Vanadium
Nickel
Uranium
Data Availability
All available data from natural waters across the Fitzroy Basin was included in the report. However, this data is not collected specifically for monitoring the suitability for use as irrigation water. Some catchments may have only several monitoring sites whereas there may be many more locations were irrigation waters are extracted for creeks or rivers.
Warning
These reports are provided as a guide only and come with the following warnings:
- These reports are only a guide to provide an indication of the potential water quality for agricultural uses for particular catchments.
- Water quality can vary significantly, both between waterways and even along the same waterway. These results may not be reflective of water at a particular site of interest.
- These results relate to surface waters and not groundwater. The quality of underlying groundwater can vary significantly from surfacewaters
- The physical and chemical properties of soil used for cropping is just as (if not more) significant than the quality of water used for cropping. Farmers must understand properties of both their soil and irrigation water and how these two components interact to either accumulate or dilute particular parameters
- These reports are based on third party data. Third parties may not be sampling for all of the indicators that are important in determining suitability of water for irrigation purposes.
- Where poor water quality is suspected, specific water quality testing should be coducteded at an enterprise level to determine likely impact on crop production.
- Crop reports have been prepared by applying the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. These guidelines are trigger values below which there should be no short-term impact on crop production.
About Crop reports
For more information see the FAQ's page
Crop reports have been prepared by applying Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality to data in the Fitzroy Partnership database. These results are then averaged and graded using the Irrigation Water Method.
What water is graded?
Unprocessed (raw) surface water in creeks, rivers or on-stream storages has been rated for its suitability for irrigation of certain crops.
Have all water parameters that might affect crop production been included?
No. Plant health and production can be affected by the physical and chemical properties of irrigation water, however the impact on production can be very situation specific. Factors which need to be considered include: the sensitivity of the crop being cultivated, the characteristics of the soil under irrigation, soil management and water management practices, climate and rainfall. Only some of the chemical characteristic that may affect plant health have been used. The Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality also include threshold levels of pesticides but there is insufficient data available in the Fitzroy Basin to include these parameters in the reports.
Are other sources of information available?
Yes. A software package, SALF V2, is available that provides for a more detailed assessment of the impact that salinity levels in irrigation water have on crop production.