Ag Reporting

2018-19 agricultural use summary

For 2018-19, A and B grades were awarded to all catchments for agricultural use of water.

For stock water, Lower Isaac, Fitzroy, Theresa, Upper Dawson, Lower Dawson and Nogoa received A grades. and Callide, Comet, Connors, Mackenzie and Upper Isaac received B grades.

For crop water, Lower Isaac, Fitzroy, Theresa, Upper Dawson, Lower Dawson and Nogoa received A grades. and Callide, Comet, Connors, Mackenzie and Upper Isaac received B grades.

Return to Overview

Overview

Suitability for Cropping

Summary of water quality results from creeks, rivers or on-stream storages compared to water quality thresholds for particular crops.

Catchment Grade
Callide B
Comet B
Connors B
Lower Isaac A
Fitzroy A
Theresa A
Mackenzie B
Upper Dawson A
Lower Dawson A
Nogoa A
Upper Isaac B

Exceedances

Electrical Conductivity

Lucerne on Loam

Callide:

Site #2582 Site #1714 Site #1731

Theresa:

Site #1781

Upper Isaac:

Site #9802 Site #9804

Implications

Citrus on Sand

Callide:

Site #2582 Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741

Theresa:

Site #1781

Upper Isaac:

Site #9574 Site #9802 Site #9804

Implications

Peanuts on Sand

Callide:

Site #2582 Site #1714 Site #1731

Upper Isaac:

Site #9804

Implications

Cotton on Clay

Callide:

Site #1714 Site #1731

Upper Isaac:

Site #9804

Implications

Chloride

Cotton

Callide:

Site #2582

Theresa:

Site #2442 Site #2443

Upper Isaac:

Site #2735 Site #9804

Lucerne

Callide:

Site #2582 Site #1569

Theresa:

Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443

Mackenzie:

Site #9830 Site #2446 Site #9194

Upper Isaac:

Site #2735 Site #9802 Site #9804

Citrus

Callide:

Site #2582 Site #1569 Site #1647

Fitzroy:

Site #1690 Site #2472

Theresa:

Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445

Mackenzie:

Site #9830 Site #1760 Site #2446 Site #9194

Upper Isaac:

Site #2735 Site #9802 Site #9804

Implications

Sodium

Lucerne

Callide:

Site #2582 Site #9550 Site #1714

Theresa:

Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443

Mackenzie:

Site #9830

Upper Dawson:

Site #1474

Upper Isaac:

Site #9802 Site #9804

Citrus

Callide:

Site #2582 Site #9550 Site #1569 Site #1647 Site #1698 Site #1714

Fitzroy:

Site #1690

Theresa:

Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445

Mackenzie:

Site #9830 Site #1760 Site #2446 Site #9194 Site #9713

Upper Dawson:

Site #1474

Upper Isaac:

Site #9852 Site #9802 Site #9804

Cotton

Theresa:

Site #2442 Site #2443

Upper Isaac:

Site #9802 Site #9804

Implications

Aluminium

Callide:

Site #9550 Site #1714

Comet:

Site #9724 Site #9889 Site #2766 Site #2767 Site #2768 Site #2479 Site #2487

Connors:

Site #9212 Site #2403 Site #9898

Theresa:

Site #9893 Site #9907 Site #9910 Site #9914 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #9895 Site #9906

Mackenzie:

Site #9187 Site #9249 Site #9251 Site #9305 Site #2598 Site #2607 Site #9278 Site #34 Site #64 Site #2061 Site #2062 Site #2446 Site #2480 Site #2481 Site #9795 Site #9794 Site #9194

Upper Isaac:

Site #9853 Site #9834 Site #9862 Site #9817 Site #9810 Site #9574 Site #9819 Site #9870 Site #9803 Site #2782 Site #9864 Site #9804 Site #9812 Site #9675 Site #9808

Implications

Cobalt

Callide:

Site #9550 Site #1714

Comet:

Site #2767

Theresa:

Site #9910

Mackenzie:

Site #2480

Implications

Copper

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Fluoride

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Manganese

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Zinc

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Iron

Comet:

Site #9724 Site #9889 Site #2766 Site #2767 Site #2768 Site #9843 Site #9849 Site #2479 Site #2485 Site #2487 Site #9797

Connors:

Site #9212 Site #2403

Theresa:

Site #9893 Site #9924 Site #9896 Site #9910 Site #9914 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #9895 Site #9916 Site #9912

Mackenzie:

Site #9187 Site #9301 Site #9281 Site #9375 Site #9249 Site #9379 Site #9251 Site #9305 Site #2598 Site #2607 Site #9830 Site #9278 Site #34 Site #64 Site #2059 Site #2061 Site #2062 Site #2446 Site #2480 Site #2481 Site #9795 Site #9419 Site #9794 Site #9194

Lower Dawson:

Site #2394 Site #2572

Upper Isaac:

Site #9806 Site #9853 Site #9877 Site #9834 Site #9862 Site #9817 Site #9810 Site #9574 Site #9819 Site #9835 Site #9870 Site #9803 Site #9573 Site #9864 Site #9802 Site #9804 Site #9831 Site #9812 Site #86 Site #93 Site #119 Site #9800 Site #9675 Site #9808

Implications

Cadmium

Upper Isaac:

Site #9195

Implications

Data Availability

All available data from natural waters across the Fitzroy Basin was included in the report. However, this data is not collected specifically for monitoring the suitability for use as irrigation water. Some catchments may have only several monitoring sites whereas there may be many more locations were irrigation waters are extracted for creeks or rivers.

Warning

These reports are provided as a guide only and come with the following warnings:

  • These reports are only a guide to provide an indication of the potential water quality for agricultural uses for particular catchments.
  • Water quality can vary significantly, both between waterways and even along the same waterway. These results may not be reflective of water at a particular site of interest.
  • These results relate to surface waters and not groundwater. The quality of underlying groundwater can vary significantly from surfacewaters
  • The physical and chemical properties of soil used for cropping is just as (if not more) significant than the quality of water used for cropping. Farmers must understand properties of both their soil and irrigation water and how these two components interact to either accumulate or dilute particular parameters
  • These reports are based on third party data. Third parties may not be sampling for all of the indicators that are important in determining suitability of water for irrigation purposes.
  • Where poor water quality is suspected, specific water quality testing should be coducteded at an enterprise level to determine likely impact on crop production.
  • Crop reports have been prepared by applying the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. These guidelines are trigger values below which there should be no short-term impact on crop production.

About Crop reports

For more information see the FAQ's page

Crop reports have been prepared by applying Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality to data in the Fitzroy Partnership database. These results are then averaged and graded using the Irrigation Water Method.

What water is graded?

Unprocessed (raw) surface water in creeks, rivers or on-stream storages has been rated for its suitability for irrigation of certain crops.

Have all water parameters that might affect crop production been included?

No. Plant health and production can be affected by the physical and chemical properties of irrigation water, however the impact on production can be very situation specific. Factors which need to be considered include: the sensitivity of the crop being cultivated, the characteristics of the soil under irrigation, soil management and water management practices, climate and rainfall. Only some of the chemical characteristic that may affect plant health have been used. The Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality also include threshold levels of pesticides but there is insufficient data available in the Fitzroy Basin to include these parameters in the reports.

Are other sources of information available?

Yes. A software package, SALF V2, is available that provides for a more detailed assessment of the impact that salinity levels in irrigation water have on crop production.