Ag Reporting

2014-15 agricultural use summary

For 2014-15, A and B grades were awarded to all catchments for agricultural use of water.

For stock water, all catchments received A grades, except for Comet and Upper Isaac which received a B grade.

For crop water, all catchments received A grades, except for Callide, Comet and Upper Isaac which received a B grade.

Return to Overview

Overview

Suitability for Cropping

Summary of water quality results from creeks, rivers or on-stream storages compared to water quality thresholds for particular crops.

Catchment Grade
Callide B
Comet B
Connors A
Lower Isaac A
Fitzroy A
Theresa A
Mackenzie A
Upper Dawson A
Lower Dawson A
Nogoa A
Upper Isaac B

Exceedances

Chloride

Citrus

Callide:

Site #2583 Site #2605 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1647 Site #1655 Site #1714

Connors:

Site #2784 Site #2785 Site #2787

Fitzroy:

Site #1690

Theresa:

Site #1781

Mackenzie:

Site #1760

Upper Dawson:

Site #2800

Upper Isaac:

Site #2759 Site #96 Site #119 Site #139

Lucerne

Callide:

Site #2583 Site #1569 Site #1581

Connors:

Site #2785

Upper Isaac:

Site #96 Site #139

Cotton

Upper Isaac:

Site #96

Implications

Sodium

Citrus

Callide:

Site #2583 Site #2605 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1647 Site #1698 Site #1714

Connors:

Site #2785 Site #2786 Site #2787

Fitzroy:

Site #1690

Theresa:

Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2445

Mackenzie:

Site #1760 Site #2222 Site #2223 Site #2446

Upper Dawson:

Site #2800

Upper Isaac:

Site #2759 Site #96 Site #119 Site #139

Lucerne

Callide:

Site #1714

Connors:

Site #2785

Mackenzie:

Site #2223

Upper Isaac:

Site #2759 Site #96

Cotton

Mackenzie:

Site #2223

Upper Isaac:

Site #96

Implications

Electrical Conductivity

Cotton on Clay

Callide:

Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Upper Isaac:

Site #96

Implications

Lucerne on Loam

Callide:

Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Upper Isaac:

Site #2753 Site #2765 Site #96

Implications

Citrus on Sand

Callide:

Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Mackenzie:

Site #1964

Upper Isaac:

Site #2753 Site #2765 Site #96

Implications

Peanuts on Sand

Callide:

Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Upper Isaac:

Site #96

Implications

Aluminium

Callide:

Site #1714

Mackenzie:

Site #53 Site #54 Site #59 Site #64 Site #2222 Site #2223 Site #2231 Site #2232 Site #2491 Site #2492

Upper Isaac:

Site #2753 Site #2763 Site #2765 Site #115 Site #116 Site #137 Site #140

Implications

Cobalt

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Copper

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Iron

Callide:

Site #1714

Comet:

Site #50 Site #62 Site #65

Theresa:

Site #2411 Site #2442 Site #2445

Mackenzie:

Site #2586 Site #53 Site #54 Site #57 Site #59 Site #63 Site #64 Site #2222 Site #2223 Site #2226 Site #2231 Site #2232 Site #2491 Site #2492

Upper Isaac:

Site #2753 Site #2763 Site #2765 Site #115 Site #116 Site #119 Site #137 Site #140 Site #2535 Site #2537 Site #1896

Implications

Manganese

Upper Dawson:

Site #2799 Site #2800 Site #2801 Site #2802 Site #2803

Implications

Data Availability

All available data from natural waters across the Fitzroy Basin was included in the report. However, this data is not collected specifically for monitoring the suitability for use as irrigation water. Some catchments may have only several monitoring sites whereas there may be many more locations were irrigation waters are extracted for creeks or rivers.

Warning

These reports are provided as a guide only and come with the following warnings:

  • These reports are only a guide to provide an indication of the potential water quality for agricultural uses for particular catchments.
  • Water quality can vary significantly, both between waterways and even along the same waterway. These results may not be reflective of water at a particular site of interest.
  • These results relate to surface waters and not groundwater. The quality of underlying groundwater can vary significantly from surfacewaters
  • The physical and chemical properties of soil used for cropping is just as (if not more) significant than the quality of water used for cropping. Farmers must understand properties of both their soil and irrigation water and how these two components interact to either accumulate or dilute particular parameters
  • These reports are based on third party data. Third parties may not be sampling for all of the indicators that are important in determining suitability of water for irrigation purposes.
  • Where poor water quality is suspected, specific water quality testing should be coducteded at an enterprise level to determine likely impact on crop production.
  • Crop reports have been prepared by applying the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. These guidelines are trigger values below which there should be no short-term impact on crop production.

About Crop reports

For more information see the FAQ's page

Crop reports have been prepared by applying Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality to data in the Fitzroy Partnership database. These results are then averaged and graded using the Irrigation Water Method.

What water is graded?

Unprocessed (raw) surface water in creeks, rivers or on-stream storages has been rated for its suitability for irrigation of certain crops.

Have all water parameters that might affect crop production been included?

No. Plant health and production can be affected by the physical and chemical properties of irrigation water, however the impact on production can be very situation specific. Factors which need to be considered include: the sensitivity of the crop being cultivated, the characteristics of the soil under irrigation, soil management and water management practices, climate and rainfall. Only some of the chemical characteristic that may affect plant health have been used. The Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality also include threshold levels of pesticides but there is insufficient data available in the Fitzroy Basin to include these parameters in the reports.

Are other sources of information available?

Yes. A software package, SALF V2, is available that provides for a more detailed assessment of the impact that salinity levels in irrigation water have on crop production.