Ag Reporting

2017-18 agricultural use summary

For 2017-18, A and B grades were awarded to all catchments for agricultural use of water.

For stock water, Lower Isaac, Fitzroy, Upper Dawson, Lower Dawson and Nogoa received A grades. and Callide, Comet, Connors, Theresa, Mackenzie and Upper Isaac received B grades.

For crop water, all catchments received A grades, except for Callide, Comet and Upper Isaac which received a B grade.

Return to Overview

Overview

Suitability for Cropping

Summary of water quality results from creeks, rivers or on-stream storages compared to water quality thresholds for particular crops.

Catchment Grade
Callide B
Comet B
Connors A
Lower Isaac A
Fitzroy A
Theresa A
Mackenzie A
Upper Dawson A
Lower Dawson A
Nogoa A
Upper Isaac B

Exceedances

Chloride

Citrus

Callide:

Site #9558 Site #2582 Site #2583 Site #2611 Site #9550 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1647 Site #1655 Site #1714

Fitzroy:

Site #1690

Theresa:

Site #9125 Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2445

Mackenzie:

Site #9122 Site #9299 Site #1760 Site #2446 Site #9439

Lucerne

Callide:

Site #2582 Site #2611 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1655

Theresa:

Site #9125 Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2445

Mackenzie:

Site #9122 Site #9299 Site #2446

Cotton

Callide:

Site #2582

Theresa:

Site #9125

Mackenzie:

Site #9122

Implications

Sodium

Citrus

Callide:

Site #9558 Site #9554 Site #2582 Site #2583 Site #2605 Site #2611 Site #9550 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1647 Site #1655 Site #1714 Site #9548

Connors:

Site #9201

Fitzroy:

Site #1690

Theresa:

Site #9125 Site #1781 Site #2442

Mackenzie:

Site #9130 Site #9730 Site #9714 Site #9067 Site #9305 Site #9702 Site #2598 Site #9122 Site #9299 Site #1760 Site #2227 Site #9713 Site #9439 Site #9720

Upper Isaac:

Site #9731

Lucerne

Callide:

Site #2582 Site #9550 Site #1581 Site #1714

Theresa:

Site #9125 Site #1781

Mackenzie:

Site #9130 Site #9730 Site #9714 Site #9067 Site #9305 Site #9702 Site #2598 Site #9122 Site #9299 Site #2227 Site #9439

Upper Isaac:

Site #9731

Cotton

Callide:

Site #9550 Site #1714

Theresa:

Site #9125

Mackenzie:

Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122

Upper Isaac:

Site #9731

Implications

Cobalt

Callide:

Site #9554 Site #9550 Site #1714

Comet:

Site #2767 Site #2479

Mackenzie:

Site #2598 Site #2227

Implications

Manganese

Callide:

Site #9554 Site #9550 Site #1714

Implications

Electrical Conductivity

Cotton on Clay

Callide:

Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Theresa:

Site #9125

Mackenzie:

Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122

Upper Isaac:

Site #9086 Site #9729 Site #9734 Site #9731

Implications

Lucerne on Loam

Callide:

Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Theresa:

Site #9125

Mackenzie:

Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122

Upper Isaac:

Site #9086 Site #9729 Site #9674 Site #9723 Site #9734 Site #9731

Implications

Citrus on Sand

Callide:

Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Theresa:

Site #9125

Mackenzie:

Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122

Upper Isaac:

Site #9086 Site #9729 Site #9674 Site #9723 Site #9734 Site #9731

Implications

Peanuts on Sand

Callide:

Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Theresa:

Site #9125

Mackenzie:

Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122

Upper Isaac:

Site #9086 Site #9729 Site #9723 Site #9734 Site #9731

Implications

Aluminium

Callide:

Site #9550 Site #1714

Comet:

Site #2766 Site #2767 Site #2768 Site #2479 Site #2485 Site #2486 Site #2487

Connors:

Site #2016 Site #2017

Theresa:

Site #2777 Site #9693 Site #9695 Site #2022 Site #2032 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445

Mackenzie:

Site #9305 Site #2798 Site #2598 Site #24 Site #32 Site #2048 Site #2227 Site #2446 Site #9440 Site #9396 Site #9438 Site #9194

Upper Isaac:

Site #9571 Site #9678 Site #9680 Site #119 Site #2536 Site #9088 Site #9675

Implications

Copper

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Fluoride

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Zinc

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Iron

Comet:

Site #9323 Site #2766 Site #2767 Site #2768 Site #2479 Site #2484 Site #2485 Site #2486 Site #2487

Connors:

Site #9100

Theresa:

Site #9693 Site #9695 Site #2032 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445

Mackenzie:

Site #9730 Site #9305 Site #2796 Site #2798 Site #2598 Site #2048 Site #2227 Site #2229 Site #2446 Site #9440 Site #9396 Site #9438 Site #9194

Upper Isaac:

Site #9729 Site #9571 Site #9678 Site #9680 Site #86 Site #88 Site #119 Site #2536 Site #9088 Site #9675

Implications

Molybdenum

Upper Isaac:

Site #9734

Implications

Data Availability

All available data from natural waters across the Fitzroy Basin was included in the report. However, this data is not collected specifically for monitoring the suitability for use as irrigation water. Some catchments may have only several monitoring sites whereas there may be many more locations were irrigation waters are extracted for creeks or rivers.

Warning

These reports are provided as a guide only and come with the following warnings:

  • These reports are only a guide to provide an indication of the potential water quality for agricultural uses for particular catchments.
  • Water quality can vary significantly, both between waterways and even along the same waterway. These results may not be reflective of water at a particular site of interest.
  • These results relate to surface waters and not groundwater. The quality of underlying groundwater can vary significantly from surfacewaters
  • The physical and chemical properties of soil used for cropping is just as (if not more) significant than the quality of water used for cropping. Farmers must understand properties of both their soil and irrigation water and how these two components interact to either accumulate or dilute particular parameters
  • These reports are based on third party data. Third parties may not be sampling for all of the indicators that are important in determining suitability of water for irrigation purposes.
  • Where poor water quality is suspected, specific water quality testing should be coducteded at an enterprise level to determine likely impact on crop production.
  • Crop reports have been prepared by applying the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. These guidelines are trigger values below which there should be no short-term impact on crop production.

About Crop reports

For more information see the FAQ's page

Crop reports have been prepared by applying Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality to data in the Fitzroy Partnership database. These results are then averaged and graded using the Irrigation Water Method.

What water is graded?

Unprocessed (raw) surface water in creeks, rivers or on-stream storages has been rated for its suitability for irrigation of certain crops.

Have all water parameters that might affect crop production been included?

No. Plant health and production can be affected by the physical and chemical properties of irrigation water, however the impact on production can be very situation specific. Factors which need to be considered include: the sensitivity of the crop being cultivated, the characteristics of the soil under irrigation, soil management and water management practices, climate and rainfall. Only some of the chemical characteristic that may affect plant health have been used. The Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality also include threshold levels of pesticides but there is insufficient data available in the Fitzroy Basin to include these parameters in the reports.

Are other sources of information available?

Yes. A software package, SALF V2, is available that provides for a more detailed assessment of the impact that salinity levels in irrigation water have on crop production.