Ag Reporting
2017-18 agricultural use summary
For 2017-18, A and B grades were awarded to all catchments for agricultural use of water.
For stock water, Lower Isaac, Fitzroy, Upper Dawson, Lower Dawson and Nogoa received A grades. and Callide, Comet, Connors, Theresa, Mackenzie and Upper Isaac received B grades.
For crop water, all catchments received A grades, except for Callide, Comet and Upper Isaac which received a B grade.
Overview
Suitability for Cropping
Summary of water quality results from creeks, rivers or on-stream storages compared to water quality thresholds for particular crops.
Catchment | Grade |
---|---|
Callide | ![]() |
Comet | ![]() |
Connors | ![]() |
Lower Isaac | ![]() |
Fitzroy | ![]() |
Theresa | ![]() |
Mackenzie | ![]() |
Upper Dawson | ![]() |
Lower Dawson | ![]() |
Nogoa | ![]() |
Upper Isaac | ![]() |

Exceedances
Chloride
Citrus
Callide:
Site #9558 Site #2582 Site #2583 Site #2611 Site #9550 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1647 Site #1655 Site #1714Fitzroy:
Site #1690Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9122 Site #9299 Site #1760 Site #2446 Site #9439Lucerne
Callide:
Site #2582 Site #2611 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1655Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9122 Site #9299 Site #2446Cotton
Callide:
Site #2582Theresa:
Site #9125Mackenzie:
Site #9122Implications
Sodium
Citrus
Callide:
Site #9558 Site #9554 Site #2582 Site #2583 Site #2605 Site #2611 Site #9550 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1647 Site #1655 Site #1714 Site #9548Connors:
Site #9201Fitzroy:
Site #1690Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #1781 Site #2442Mackenzie:
Site #9130 Site #9730 Site #9714 Site #9067 Site #9305 Site #9702 Site #2598 Site #9122 Site #9299 Site #1760 Site #2227 Site #9713 Site #9439 Site #9720Upper Isaac:
Site #9731Lucerne
Callide:
Site #2582 Site #9550 Site #1581 Site #1714Theresa:
Site #9125 Site #1781Mackenzie:
Site #9130 Site #9730 Site #9714 Site #9067 Site #9305 Site #9702 Site #2598 Site #9122 Site #9299 Site #2227 Site #9439Upper Isaac:
Site #9731Cotton
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Theresa:
Site #9125Mackenzie:
Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122Upper Isaac:
Site #9731Implications
Cobalt
Callide:
Site #9554 Site #9550 Site #1714Comet:
Site #2767 Site #2479Mackenzie:
Site #2598 Site #2227Implications
Manganese
Electrical Conductivity
Cotton on Clay
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743Theresa:
Site #9125Mackenzie:
Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122Upper Isaac:
Site #9086 Site #9729 Site #9734 Site #9731Implications
Lucerne on Loam
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743Theresa:
Site #9125Mackenzie:
Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122Upper Isaac:
Site #9086 Site #9729 Site #9674 Site #9723 Site #9734 Site #9731Implications
Citrus on Sand
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743Theresa:
Site #9125Mackenzie:
Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122Upper Isaac:
Site #9086 Site #9729 Site #9674 Site #9723 Site #9734 Site #9731Implications
Peanuts on Sand
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743Theresa:
Site #9125Mackenzie:
Site #9067 Site #2598 Site #9122Upper Isaac:
Site #9086 Site #9729 Site #9723 Site #9734 Site #9731Implications
Aluminium
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Comet:
Site #2766 Site #2767 Site #2768 Site #2479 Site #2485 Site #2486 Site #2487Connors:
Site #2016 Site #2017Theresa:
Site #2777 Site #9693 Site #9695 Site #2022 Site #2032 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9305 Site #2798 Site #2598 Site #24 Site #32 Site #2048 Site #2227 Site #2446 Site #9440 Site #9396 Site #9438 Site #9194Upper Isaac:
Site #9571 Site #9678 Site #9680 Site #119 Site #2536 Site #9088 Site #9675Implications
Copper
Fluoride
Zinc
Iron
Comet:
Site #9323 Site #2766 Site #2767 Site #2768 Site #2479 Site #2484 Site #2485 Site #2486 Site #2487Connors:
Site #9100Theresa:
Site #9693 Site #9695 Site #2032 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2445Mackenzie:
Site #9730 Site #9305 Site #2796 Site #2798 Site #2598 Site #2048 Site #2227 Site #2229 Site #2446 Site #9440 Site #9396 Site #9438 Site #9194Upper Isaac:
Site #9729 Site #9571 Site #9678 Site #9680 Site #86 Site #88 Site #119 Site #2536 Site #9088 Site #9675Implications
Molybdenum
Data Availability
All available data from natural waters across the Fitzroy Basin was included in the report. However, this data is not collected specifically for monitoring the suitability for use as irrigation water. Some catchments may have only several monitoring sites whereas there may be many more locations were irrigation waters are extracted for creeks or rivers.
Warning
These reports are provided as a guide only and come with the following warnings:
- These reports are only a guide to provide an indication of the potential water quality for agricultural uses for particular catchments.
- Water quality can vary significantly, both between waterways and even along the same waterway. These results may not be reflective of water at a particular site of interest.
- These results relate to surface waters and not groundwater. The quality of underlying groundwater can vary significantly from surfacewaters
- The physical and chemical properties of soil used for cropping is just as (if not more) significant than the quality of water used for cropping. Farmers must understand properties of both their soil and irrigation water and how these two components interact to either accumulate or dilute particular parameters
- These reports are based on third party data. Third parties may not be sampling for all of the indicators that are important in determining suitability of water for irrigation purposes.
- Where poor water quality is suspected, specific water quality testing should be coducteded at an enterprise level to determine likely impact on crop production.
- Crop reports have been prepared by applying the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. These guidelines are trigger values below which there should be no short-term impact on crop production.
About Crop reports
For more information see the FAQ's page
Crop reports have been prepared by applying Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality to data in the Fitzroy Partnership database. These results are then averaged and graded using the Irrigation Water Method.
What water is graded?
Unprocessed (raw) surface water in creeks, rivers or on-stream storages has been rated for its suitability for irrigation of certain crops.
Have all water parameters that might affect crop production been included?
No. Plant health and production can be affected by the physical and chemical properties of irrigation water, however the impact on production can be very situation specific. Factors which need to be considered include: the sensitivity of the crop being cultivated, the characteristics of the soil under irrigation, soil management and water management practices, climate and rainfall. Only some of the chemical characteristic that may affect plant health have been used. The Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality also include threshold levels of pesticides but there is insufficient data available in the Fitzroy Basin to include these parameters in the reports.
Are other sources of information available?
Yes. A software package, SALF V2, is available that provides for a more detailed assessment of the impact that salinity levels in irrigation water have on crop production.