Ag Reporting

2016-17 agricultural use summary

For 2016-17, A and B grades were awarded to all catchments for agricultural use of water.

For stock water, Connors, Lower Isaac, Fitzroy, Upper Dawson, Lower Dawson and Nogoa received A grades. and Callide, Comet, Theresa, Mackenzie and Upper Isaac received B grades.

For crop water, Connors, Lower Isaac, Fitzroy, Theresa, Upper Dawson, Lower Dawson and Nogoa received A grades. and Callide, Comet, Mackenzie and Upper Isaac received B grades.

Return to Overview

Overview

Suitability for Cropping

Summary of water quality results from creeks, rivers or on-stream storages compared to water quality thresholds for particular crops.

Catchment Grade
Callide B
Comet B
Connors A
Lower Isaac A
Fitzroy A
Theresa A
Mackenzie B
Upper Dawson A
Lower Dawson A
Nogoa A
Upper Isaac B

Exceedances

Electrical Conductivity

Cotton on Clay

Callide:

Site #2701 Site #1698 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Lower Dawson:

Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9108

Upper Isaac:

Site #140 Site #9243

Implications

Lucerne on Loam

Callide:

Site #2701 Site #1698 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Lower Dawson:

Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9109 Site #9108 Site #9112

Upper Isaac:

Site #140 Site #9243

Implications

Citrus on Sand

Callide:

Site #2701 Site #1698 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Lower Dawson:

Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9106 Site #9109 Site #9108 Site #9112

Upper Isaac:

Site #140 Site #9243

Implications

Peanuts on Sand

Callide:

Site #2701 Site #1698 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1741 Site #1743

Lower Dawson:

Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9108 Site #9112

Upper Isaac:

Site #140 Site #9243

Implications

Chloride

Cotton

Callide:

Site #2701 Site #2582

Lucerne

Callide:

Site #2701 Site #2582 Site #1569 Site #1581

Connors:

Site #9201

Citrus

Callide:

Site #2701 Site #2582 Site #2583 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1655 Site #1714

Comet:

Site #2386

Connors:

Site #9201 Site #9369 Site #2016

Fitzroy:

Site #1690

Theresa:

Site #1781

Implications

Sodium

Cotton

Callide:

Site #2701

Mackenzie:

Site #2232

Lucerne

Callide:

Site #2701 Site #2717

Comet:

Site #2386

Connors:

Site #9201 Site #9369 Site #2600 Site #2016

Theresa:

Site #2442

Mackenzie:

Site #9130 Site #2232

Citrus

Callide:

Site #2701 Site #2717 Site #1569 Site #1581 Site #1655 Site #1698

Comet:

Site #2386

Connors:

Site #9201 Site #9369 Site #2600 Site #2016 Site #2407

Fitzroy:

Site #1690

Theresa:

Site #2442 Site #2443

Mackenzie:

Site #9130 Site #9135 Site #2773 Site #24 Site #2227 Site #2232 Site #2446 Site #9194

Implications

Aluminium

Callide:

Site #1714

Comet:

Site #2766 Site #2767 Site #2768 Site #2479 Site #2484 Site #2485 Site #2486 Site #2487

Connors:

Site #2776 Site #2016 Site #2017 Site #2407

Theresa:

Site #2777 Site #2022 Site #2032 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #2408

Mackenzie:

Site #9130 Site #2598 Site #24 Site #34 Site #59 Site #64 Site #2048 Site #2061 Site #2225 Site #2229 Site #2232 Site #2393 Site #2399 Site #2446 Site #2491

Upper Isaac:

Site #9385 Site #9197 Site #9198 Site #2753 Site #2758 Site #2761 Site #2782 Site #88 Site #119 Site #139 Site #140 Site #142 Site #2515 Site #9083 Site #9363 Site #9384 Site #9365 Site #9391 Site #9388

Implications

Cadmium

Callide:

Site #1714

Theresa:

Site #2777

Mackenzie:

Site #2393

Implications

Cobalt

Callide:

Site #1714

Mackenzie:

Site #2393

Upper Isaac:

Site #2782

Implications

Copper

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Manganese

Callide:

Site #1714

Mackenzie:

Site #2393

Lower Dawson:

Site #9108

Implications

Zinc

Callide:

Site #1714

Implications

Iron

Comet:

Site #2766 Site #2767 Site #2768 Site #2479 Site #2482 Site #2484 Site #2485 Site #2486 Site #2487

Connors:

Site #9201 Site #2776 Site #2016 Site #2017 Site #2019 Site #2407

Fitzroy:

Site #2221

Theresa:

Site #2777 Site #2022 Site #2032 Site #2442 Site #2443

Mackenzie:

Site #9130 Site #9377 Site #2773 Site #2598 Site #24 Site #32 Site #34 Site #59 Site #64 Site #2048 Site #2061 Site #2225 Site #2228 Site #2229 Site #2232 Site #2393 Site #2399 Site #2446 Site #2491

Upper Isaac:

Site #9385 Site #9197 Site #9380 Site #9198 Site #9381 Site #2753 Site #2758 Site #2761 Site #2782 Site #86 Site #88 Site #115 Site #116 Site #117 Site #119 Site #137 Site #139 Site #140 Site #142 Site #2515 Site #9363 Site #9366 Site #9384 Site #9365 Site #9391 Site #9388

Implications

Fluoride

Comet:

Site #2486

Implications

Mercury

Mackenzie:

Site #2393

Implications

Uranium

Upper Isaac:

Site #2782

Implications

Vanadium

Upper Isaac:

Site #2782

Implications

Data Availability

All available data from natural waters across the Fitzroy Basin was included in the report. However, this data is not collected specifically for monitoring the suitability for use as irrigation water. Some catchments may have only several monitoring sites whereas there may be many more locations were irrigation waters are extracted for creeks or rivers.

Warning

These reports are provided as a guide only and come with the following warnings:

  • These reports are only a guide to provide an indication of the potential water quality for agricultural uses for particular catchments.
  • Water quality can vary significantly, both between waterways and even along the same waterway. These results may not be reflective of water at a particular site of interest.
  • These results relate to surface waters and not groundwater. The quality of underlying groundwater can vary significantly from surfacewaters
  • The physical and chemical properties of soil used for cropping is just as (if not more) significant than the quality of water used for cropping. Farmers must understand properties of both their soil and irrigation water and how these two components interact to either accumulate or dilute particular parameters
  • These reports are based on third party data. Third parties may not be sampling for all of the indicators that are important in determining suitability of water for irrigation purposes.
  • Where poor water quality is suspected, specific water quality testing should be coducteded at an enterprise level to determine likely impact on crop production.
  • Crop reports have been prepared by applying the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. These guidelines are trigger values below which there should be no short-term impact on crop production.

About Crop reports

For more information see the FAQ's page

Crop reports have been prepared by applying Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality to data in the Fitzroy Partnership database. These results are then averaged and graded using the Irrigation Water Method.

What water is graded?

Unprocessed (raw) surface water in creeks, rivers or on-stream storages has been rated for its suitability for irrigation of certain crops.

Have all water parameters that might affect crop production been included?

No. Plant health and production can be affected by the physical and chemical properties of irrigation water, however the impact on production can be very situation specific. Factors which need to be considered include: the sensitivity of the crop being cultivated, the characteristics of the soil under irrigation, soil management and water management practices, climate and rainfall. Only some of the chemical characteristic that may affect plant health have been used. The Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality also include threshold levels of pesticides but there is insufficient data available in the Fitzroy Basin to include these parameters in the reports.

Are other sources of information available?

Yes. A software package, SALF V2, is available that provides for a more detailed assessment of the impact that salinity levels in irrigation water have on crop production.