Ag Reporting
2019-20 agricultural use summary
For 2019-20, A, B and C grades were awarded to all catchments for agricultural use of water.
For stock water, all catchments received A grades, except for Callide and Upper Isaac which received a B grade and Connors which received a C.
For crop water, all catchments received A grades, except for Callide, Connors and Upper Isaac which received a B grade.
Overview
Suitability for Cropping
Summary of water quality results from creeks, rivers or on-stream storages compared to water quality thresholds for particular crops.
Catchment | Grade |
---|---|
Callide | ![]() |
Comet | ![]() |
Connors | ![]() |
Lower Isaac | ![]() |
Fitzroy | ![]() |
Theresa | ![]() |
Mackenzie | ![]() |
Upper Dawson | ![]() |
Lower Dawson | ![]() |
Nogoa | ![]() |
Upper Isaac | ![]() |

Exceedances
Cobalt
Manganese
Chloride
Citrus
Callide:
Site #2582 Site #2611 Site #9550 Site #1569 Site #1647 Site #1714Comet:
Site #2729 Site #2386Fitzroy:
Site #1690 Site #1750 Site #2472Theresa:
Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443Mackenzie:
Site #1760 Site #9194Upper Isaac:
Site #9574 Site #9802 Site #9800Lucerne
Callide:
Site #1569Comet:
Site #2729Fitzroy:
Site #1750Theresa:
Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443Mackenzie:
Site #9194Cotton
Comet:
Site #2729Fitzroy:
Site #1750Theresa:
Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443Implications
Electrical Conductivity
Cotton on Clay
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731Comet:
Site #2729Theresa:
Site #1781Lower Dawson:
Site #9105Implications
Lucerne on Loam
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731Comet:
Site #2729Theresa:
Site #1781Lower Dawson:
Site #9105Implications
Citrus on Sand
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731 Site #1743Comet:
Site #2729Theresa:
Site #1781Lower Dawson:
Site #9105Implications
Peanuts on Sand
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714 Site #1721 Site #1731Comet:
Site #2729Theresa:
Site #1781Lower Dawson:
Site #9105Implications
Sodium
Cotton
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Comet:
Site #2729Theresa:
Site #1781Lower Dawson:
Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9106 Site #9109 Site #9108Lucerne
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1714Comet:
Site #2729 Site #2386Fitzroy:
Site #1750Theresa:
Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443Mackenzie:
Site #9194Lower Dawson:
Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9106 Site #9109 Site #9108 Site #9112Upper Isaac:
Site #9574 Site #9802Citrus
Callide:
Site #9550 Site #1569 Site #1647 Site #1698 Site #1714Comet:
Site #2729 Site #2386Fitzroy:
Site #1690 Site #1750Theresa:
Site #1781 Site #2442 Site #2443Mackenzie:
Site #9130 Site #9301 Site #1760 Site #9194Lower Dawson:
Site #9110 Site #9105 Site #9106 Site #9109 Site #9111 Site #9108 Site #9112Upper Isaac:
Site #9574 Site #9802 Site #9800Implications
Aluminium
Callide:
Site #1714Comet:
Site #9889 Site #2484 Site #2487Connors:
Site #9210 Site #2403 Site #2407Theresa:
Site #9907 Site #2442 Site #2443 Site #9906Mackenzie:
Site #33 Site #64 Site #9795 Site #9194Lower Dawson:
Site #9116 Site #9106Upper Isaac:
Site #9853 Site #9817 Site #9799 Site #9803 Site #86 Site #93 Site #94 Site #9823 Site #9083Implications
Copper
Iron
Comet:
Site #9889Connors:
Site #9210 Site #2403 Site #2407Lower Isaac:
Site #2576Fitzroy:
Site #2221Theresa:
Site #2442 Site #2443Mackenzie:
Site #33 Site #64 Site #9795 Site #9194Lower Dawson:
Site #9116 Site #9106Upper Isaac:
Site #9853 Site #9817 Site #9799 Site #9574 Site #9819 Site #9803 Site #2585 Site #86 Site #93 Site #94 Site #9800 Site #9823 Site #9083Implications
Data Availability
All available data from natural waters across the Fitzroy Basin was included in the report. However, this data is not collected specifically for monitoring the suitability for use as irrigation water. Some catchments may have only several monitoring sites whereas there may be many more locations were irrigation waters are extracted for creeks or rivers.
Warning
These reports are provided as a guide only and come with the following warnings:
- These reports are only a guide to provide an indication of the potential water quality for agricultural uses for particular catchments.
- Water quality can vary significantly, both between waterways and even along the same waterway. These results may not be reflective of water at a particular site of interest.
- These results relate to surface waters and not groundwater. The quality of underlying groundwater can vary significantly from surfacewaters
- The physical and chemical properties of soil used for cropping is just as (if not more) significant than the quality of water used for cropping. Farmers must understand properties of both their soil and irrigation water and how these two components interact to either accumulate or dilute particular parameters
- These reports are based on third party data. Third parties may not be sampling for all of the indicators that are important in determining suitability of water for irrigation purposes.
- Where poor water quality is suspected, specific water quality testing should be coducteded at an enterprise level to determine likely impact on crop production.
- Crop reports have been prepared by applying the Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality. These guidelines are trigger values below which there should be no short-term impact on crop production.
About Crop reports
For more information see the FAQ's page
Crop reports have been prepared by applying Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality to data in the Fitzroy Partnership database. These results are then averaged and graded using the Irrigation Water Method.
What water is graded?
Unprocessed (raw) surface water in creeks, rivers or on-stream storages has been rated for its suitability for irrigation of certain crops.
Have all water parameters that might affect crop production been included?
No. Plant health and production can be affected by the physical and chemical properties of irrigation water, however the impact on production can be very situation specific. Factors which need to be considered include: the sensitivity of the crop being cultivated, the characteristics of the soil under irrigation, soil management and water management practices, climate and rainfall. Only some of the chemical characteristic that may affect plant health have been used. The Australian and New Zealand Guidelines for Fresh and Marine Water Quality also include threshold levels of pesticides but there is insufficient data available in the Fitzroy Basin to include these parameters in the reports.
Are other sources of information available?
Yes. A software package, SALF V2, is available that provides for a more detailed assessment of the impact that salinity levels in irrigation water have on crop production.